How to Defend Against Resisting Arrest Criminal Charges in Illinois

Law Offices of David L. Freidberg, P.C.

Facing a resisting arrest charge in Illinois can be an overwhelming and frightening experience. As a seasoned criminal defense attorney, I’ve encountered numerous clients who were bewildered by the complexities of their case and the severe consequences they might face if convicted. Understanding the intricacies of resisting arrest charges and the possible defenses available is crucial to navigating this challenging legal matter.

When accused of resisting arrest, it’s essential to grasp the full scope of the charges and the potential repercussions. Resisting arrest is not just a minor offense; it can carry significant penalties, including fines, imprisonment, and a lasting criminal record that can impact your future opportunities. This blog will examine the specific statutes governing resisting arrest in Illinois, define key legal terms, outline the classifications and enhancements of the charge, discuss potential punishments, and explain the criminal justice process. Additionally, I’ll cover common defenses against these charges and underscore the importance of having a skilled attorney by your side. By the end of this article, you will have a comprehensive understanding of resisting arrest charges and how the Law Offices of David L. Freidberg can assist you in mounting a robust defense.

Illinois Statute on Resisting Arrest

In Illinois, resisting arrest is primarily governed by Illinois Compiled Statutes (ILCS) under 720 ILCS 5/31-1. According to this statute, a person commits the offense of resisting or obstructing a peace officer, firefighter, or correctional institution employee if they knowingly resist or obstruct someone known to be a peace officer, firefighter, or correctional institution employee in the performance of their official duties. The key element here is the knowing aspect – the prosecution must prove that the defendant was aware that the individual they were resisting was a peace officer or other specified official performing their duty.

The statute is broad and covers various forms of resistance, ranging from physical actions, such as struggling during an arrest, to non-physical actions, like providing false information to law enforcement officers. The law’s intent is to ensure that peace officers and other officials can perform their duties without interference, but it also means that the statute can be applied in numerous situations, sometimes resulting in charges that might seem excessive given the circumstances.

To fully comprehend the charge of resisting arrest, it is important to understand several key legal definitions that frequently appear in these cases. These definitions clarify what constitutes resistance and who is protected under the statute.

  1. Peace Officer: This term includes police officers, sheriffs, deputy sheriffs, and other law enforcement personnel authorized to enforce the laws of the state of Illinois.
  2. Firefighter: Includes not only those actively fighting fires but also those involved in fire prevention and investigation activities.
  3. Correctional Institution Employee: This category encompasses employees of jails, prisons, and other correctional facilities, including guards and administrative personnel.
  4. Knowingly: For the purposes of resisting arrest charges, “knowingly” means that the defendant was aware or should have been aware that their actions would interfere with an officer performing their duties.

Understanding these definitions helps in recognizing the boundaries of the law and what behavior might be considered as resisting arrest under Illinois statutes.

Classification of the Charge Under Illinois Criminal Law

Resisting arrest in Illinois is classified as a Class A misdemeanor. This classification is significant as it denotes the seriousness of the offense and the potential penalties that can be imposed upon conviction. However, under certain circumstances, the charge can be elevated to a more severe classification if specific aggravating factors are present.

A Class A misdemeanor is the most serious type of misdemeanor in Illinois. Conviction of a Class A misdemeanor can result in substantial penalties, reflecting the gravity with which the state treats offenses that obstruct law enforcement officers in their duties. It’s important to recognize that while misdemeanors are generally seen as less severe than felonies, the consequences of a Class A misdemeanor can still be quite severe.

Potential Criminal Enhancements

While resisting arrest is typically a Class A misdemeanor, certain circumstances can enhance the severity of the charge, potentially leading to more severe penalties. Enhancements often depend on the nature of the resistance and any resulting harm or risk to others.

  1. Bodily Harm to an Officer: If the act of resisting arrest results in bodily harm to a peace officer, firefighter, or correctional institution employee, the charge can be elevated. In such cases, the offense can be upgraded to a felony, significantly increasing the potential penalties.
  2. Use of a Deadly Weapon: If the individual resisting arrest uses or threatens to use a deadly weapon, this can also result in an enhanced charge. The use of a weapon transforms the nature of the resistance and poses a greater threat to the safety of the officer and the public.
  3. Prior Convictions: Repeat offenders may face harsher penalties. If the defendant has previous convictions for similar offenses, the court may consider this in determining the severity of the sentence.
  4. Severity of Interference: The extent to which the resistance interfered with the officer’s duties can also be a factor. For example, significant disruption to a law enforcement operation may lead to an enhanced charge.

Potential Punishments and Consequences

The penalties for a Class A misdemeanor in Illinois can be quite severe. If convicted of resisting arrest, the individual may face the following consequences:

  1. Fines: The court may impose fines of up to $2,500. These financial penalties are intended to serve as both punishment and a deterrent to future offenses.
  2. Jail Time: Conviction can result in up to one year of imprisonment in a county jail. The length of the sentence will depend on various factors, including the circumstances of the offense and the defendant’s criminal history.
  3. Probation: In some cases, the court may opt for probation instead of jail time. Probation can include various conditions, such as regular check-ins with a probation officer, participation in community service, and compliance with specific restrictions on behavior and activities.
  4. Criminal Record: A conviction for resisting arrest results in a permanent criminal record. This record can have long-lasting implications, affecting employment opportunities, housing options, and other aspects of life.
  5. Driver’s License Suspension: Although not automatic, a conviction for resisting arrest can sometimes lead to the suspension of the defendant’s driver’s license, particularly if the offense occurred in connection with a traffic stop or other vehicular incident.

The Illinois Criminal Justice Case Process

When facing a resisting arrest charge, it’s essential to understand the criminal justice process in Illinois and why having an attorney is crucial at every step. The process typically involves several stages, each of which requires careful navigation and strategic decision-making.

  1. Arrest and Booking: After an arrest, the defendant is taken into custody and booked. This involves recording personal information, taking fingerprints, and photographing the individual. The defendant may also be held in jail pending a bail hearing.
  2. Bail Hearing: At the bail hearing, the court determines whether the defendant can be released on bail and, if so, the amount of bail required. An attorney can argue for reasonable bail terms or seek release on personal recognizance.
  3. Preliminary Hearing: During the preliminary hearing, the prosecution must demonstrate that there is probable cause to believe that the defendant committed the offense. An experienced attorney can challenge the evidence and argue for dismissal if the prosecution’s case is weak.
  4. Arraignment: At the arraignment, the defendant is formally charged and enters a plea of guilty, not guilty, or no contest. An attorney can provide guidance on the best plea to enter based on the circumstances of the case.
  5. Discovery: During the discovery phase, both sides exchange evidence and information relevant to the case. An attorney can request and review the prosecution’s evidence, identify any weaknesses, and build a defense strategy.
  6. Pre-Trial Motions: Pre-trial motions are filed to address various legal issues before the trial begins. An attorney can file motions to suppress evidence, dismiss charges, or request other favorable rulings.
  7. Trial: If the case goes to trial, both sides present their evidence and arguments. An attorney can represent the defendant in court, cross-examine witnesses, and present a robust defense.
  8. Sentencing: If the defendant is convicted, the court will impose a sentence. An attorney can argue for leniency and seek alternatives to incarceration, such as probation or community service.

Common Defenses for Resisting Arrest Charges

Defending against resisting arrest charges requires a thorough understanding of the law and a strategic approach. Some common defenses that can be employed include:

  1. Lack of Intent: One of the key elements of resisting arrest is that the defendant knowingly resisted or obstructed an officer. If it can be demonstrated that the defendant did not have the intent to resist, this can be a strong defense.
  2. Unlawful Arrest: If the arrest itself was unlawful, any resistance to that arrest may be justified. This defense hinges on proving that the officer did not have probable cause to make the arrest or that the arresting officer acted outside the scope of their authority.
  3. Self-Defense: In some cases, a defendant may argue that they were acting in self-defense if they believed that the officer was using excessive force. This defense requires showing that the defendant’s actions were reasonable under the circumstances.
  4. Misidentification: If the defendant was not the person who resisted arrest, this defense can be used to establish that there was a mistake in identifying the defendant as the perpetrator.
  5. Insufficient Evidence: The prosecution bears the burden of proving the charge beyond a reasonable doubt. If the evidence is insufficient to meet this standard, an attorney can argue for acquittal.

Why You Need an Attorney and Why Choose The Law Offices of David L. Freidberg

Facing a resisting arrest charge without the assistance of an experienced attorney can be daunting and risky. A skilled criminal defense attorney provides several crucial benefits:

  1. Expert Legal Knowledge: An attorney understands the complexities of the law and can navigate the legal system effectively.
  2. Strategic Defense Planning: An attorney can develop a comprehensive defense strategy tailored to the specific circumstances of your case.
  3. Negotiation Skills: An attorney can negotiate with the prosecution to seek reduced charges or alternative sentencing options.
  4. Courtroom Representation: An attorney can represent you in court, presenting your case persuasively and challenging the prosecution’s evidence.
  5. Support and Guidance: An attorney provides support and guidance throughout the process, helping you understand your rights and options.

Attorney Freidberg has decades of experience defending clients against resisting arrest charges. Our track record of success speaks to our dedication and skill in achieving favorable outcomes for our clients. We offer a free consultation 24/7, so you can get the legal help you need when you need it most.

Call The Law Offices of David L. Freidberg For a Free Consultation

If you or a loved one is facing resisting arrest charges in Illinois, don’t navigate this complex legal situation alone. Contact The Law Offices of David L. Freidberg today. With our extensive experience and proven track record, we are committed to providing you with the strong defense you need. Call us 24/7 at (312) 560-7100 or toll-free at (800) 803-1442 for a free consultation. We proudly serve clients throughout Chicago, Cook County, DuPage County, Will County, and Lake County in Illinois. Let us help you protect your rights and fight for the best possible outcome in your case.

Contact Us

  1. 1 Available 24/7
  2. 2 Free Consultation
  3. 3 Effective and Persuasive Defense
Fill out the contact form or call us at (312) 560-7100 or (800) 803-1442 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message